Welcome to your ultimate guide on mastering one of the most versatile tools in English grammar: the relative clause. Whether you're aiming for crystal-clear precision in your writing or looking to add sophisticated detail, understanding how to use these structures is a game-changer. Relative clauses act as the connective tissue of your sentences, linking ideas and adding essential information without creating clunky, disconnected phrases. Getting them right is key to sounding natural and professional.
This article moves beyond basic definitions. We will break down a comprehensive collection of relative clauses examples, giving you the strategic analysis needed to implement them effectively. You'll see exactly how defining clauses specify information, how non-defining clauses add extra detail, and how reduced clauses create more concise and elegant sentences.
We will explore seven distinct categories, from clauses using 'who' and 'whose' to those involving prepositions. By the end, you'll not only grasp the rules but also understand the strategy behind choosing the right clause for any context. You will leave with a clear, replicable framework for using relative clauses to transform your writing from good to exceptional. Let’s dive into the examples that will elevate your English proficiency.
1. Defining Relative Clauses (Restrictive)
Defining relative clauses, also known as restrictive clauses, are fundamental to clear and precise communication. They provide essential information that identifies exactly which person or thing we are talking about. Think of them as a spotlight, narrowing down a general noun to a specific one. Without this clause, the sentence's core meaning becomes ambiguous or is lost entirely.
Because they are so crucial, these clauses are never separated from the main sentence with commas. They are woven directly into the sentence structure, immediately following the noun they describe.
Strategic Analysis of Examples
Let's break down some defining relative clauses examples to see how they function.
Example 1: "The book that I borrowed from the library is overdue."
- Analysis: The clause "that I borrowed from the library" is essential. Without it, the sentence "The book is overdue" is too vague. Which book? The clause specifies exactly which one.
- Insight: This clause defines the subject ("The book"). It is not just any book; it is the specific one borrowed from the library.
Example 2: "Students whose grades are below average must attend tutoring."
- Analysis: The clause "whose grades are below average" restricts the noun "Students" to a specific group. It answers the question, "Which students must attend tutoring?"
- Insight: The possessive pronoun 'whose' is used here to link the students to their grades, showing a clear relationship and identifying the target group.
Actionable Takeaways
To master defining relative clauses, focus on these tactical points:
- The Litmus Test: To check if a clause is defining, try removing it. If the sentence becomes confusing or its meaning changes drastically (e.g., "Students must attend tutoring" implies all students), the clause is essential.
- Pronoun Choice: Use who for people, which or that for things and animals, and whose for possession. While 'that' is common in spoken English for people, 'who' is often preferred in formal writing.
- Omission Rule: You can often omit the relative pronoun (who, which, that) when it is the object of the clause. For instance, "The book that I borrowed..." can become "The book I borrowed..." because 'book' is the object of the verb 'borrowed'. You cannot omit it when it's the subject (e.g., "The person who called you is waiting.").
2. Non-defining Relative Clauses (Non-restrictive)
Non-defining relative clauses, also called non-restrictive clauses, add extra, non-essential information to a sentence. The noun they describe is already specific (e.g., a proper name like "Shakespeare" or a unique item like "my brother"), so this clause simply offers an interesting but removable detail. Think of it as a conversational aside that enriches the sentence without being critical to its core meaning.
A key signal of a non-defining clause is punctuation: it is always separated from the main sentence by commas. These commas act like parentheses, visually indicating that the information inside is supplementary.
Strategic Analysis of Examples
Let's dissect some non-defining relative clauses examples to understand their role.
Example 1: "My brother, who lives in Canada, is visiting next week."
- Analysis: The noun "My brother" is already identified. The clause "who lives in Canada" provides extra information. If removed, the sentence "My brother is visiting next week" still makes perfect sense.
- Insight: This clause adds a descriptive layer. It helps the listener or reader know more about the brother, but it isn't needed to understand which brother is being discussed.
Example 2: "The Eiffel Tower, which was built in 1889, attracts millions of visitors."
- Analysis: "The Eiffel Tower" is a unique, world-famous landmark. The clause "which was built in 1889" gives historical context but is not required to identify the subject.
- Insight: Using 'which' is standard for adding extra details about things or places. This technique allows writers to seamlessly blend facts and descriptions into a single, flowing sentence.
Actionable Takeaways
To use non-defining clauses effectively, apply these strategic points:
- The Comma Rule: This is non-negotiable. Always use commas to bracket a non-defining clause. If the clause is at the end of the sentence, place one comma before it.
- The 'That' Prohibition: Never use the relative pronoun that in a non-defining clause. You must use who for people and which for things.
- The Removal Test: A simple way to confirm if a clause is non-defining is to remove it. If the main sentence remains clear and grammatically correct, the clause is non-defining.
- Strategic Use: Employ these clauses to add flavor, context, or interesting facts without disrupting the main message of your sentence. They are perfect for enriching your writing.
3. Relative Clauses with 'Who' and 'Whom'
Choosing between 'who' and 'whom' is a classic grammatical challenge, but understanding their roles clarifies their use in relative clauses. These pronouns are used exclusively to refer to people. The key difference lies in their grammatical function: who acts as the subject of the clause, while whom acts as the object.
Correctly using 'who' and 'whom' adds a layer of formal precision to your writing. While 'whom' is often replaced by 'who' in casual conversation, mastering the distinction is vital for formal and professional communication. It demonstrates a sophisticated command of English grammar.
Strategic Analysis of Examples
Let's dissect some relative clauses examples to see the subject/object distinction in action.
Example 1: "The teacher who helped me passed away last year."
- Analysis: The clause "who helped me" identifies a specific teacher. Here, 'who' is the subject of the verb 'helped'. We can test this by replacing it with 'he' or 'she': "She helped me." This confirms 'who' is the correct subject pronoun.
- Insight: This is a defining clause that specifies which teacher we are discussing. The use of 'who' is essential because the pronoun performs the action in the clause.
Example 2: "The author to whom I wrote never responded."
- Analysis: The clause "to whom I wrote" modifies "author." Here, 'whom' is the object of the preposition 'to'. The subject of the verb 'wrote' is 'I'. If we rephrase the clause, it becomes "I wrote to him," showing that 'him' (the object form) is the correct choice, which corresponds to 'whom'.
- Insight: In formal writing, 'whom' is mandatory after a preposition (like 'to', 'for', 'with', 'from'). This structure, "preposition + whom," is a hallmark of grammatically precise, formal English.
Actionable Takeaways
To confidently choose between 'who' and 'whom', apply these tactical points:
- The He/Him Test: This is the most reliable method. Rephrase the relative clause as a standalone sentence using 'he' or 'him' (or 'she'/'her'). If 'he' or 'she' fits, use who. If 'him' or 'her' fits, use whom.
- Preposition Rule: If the relative pronoun immediately follows a preposition (e.g., for whom, with whom, about whom), you must use whom. This is a non-negotiable rule in standard English grammar.
- Informal Usage: In informal speech and writing, it's common to use who even when 'whom' is technically correct (e.g., "The person who you recommended..."). It's also common to move the preposition to the end of the clause, which allows for 'who': "The author who I wrote to..." While acceptable socially, stick to 'whom' in formal contexts.
4. Relative Clauses with 'Which' and 'That'
The choice between 'which' and 'that' is a common point of confusion, yet mastering it refines your writing significantly. These relative pronouns introduce clauses that describe things, animals, or ideas. The key distinction lies in whether the clause is defining (essential) or non-defining (extra information), a difference that dictates both pronoun choice and punctuation.
Generally, that is preferred for defining clauses, while which is used for non-defining clauses that are set off by commas. Understanding this rule helps create sentences that are not only grammatically correct but also stylistically polished and clear in their intent.
Strategic Analysis of Examples
Let's dissect some relative clauses examples to clarify the roles of 'which' and 'that'.
Example 1: "The car that I bought last week broke down."
- Analysis: The clause "that I bought last week" is a defining clause. It specifies exactly which car we are talking about. Without it, the sentence "The car broke down" would be unclear.
- Insight: 'That' seamlessly integrates this essential information, creating a smooth, restrictive clause without commas. In this context, using 'which' would be considered less standard in American English.
Example 2: "This computer, which cost $2000, is already outdated."
- Analysis: The clause "which cost $2000" is non-defining. The main point is that the computer is outdated; its cost is just extra information. Note the use of commas to separate the clause.
- Insight: Here, 'which' is the correct choice because the clause is non-essential. Using 'that' in a non-defining clause with commas is grammatically incorrect.
Actionable Takeaways
To use 'which' and 'that' effectively, apply these tactical points:
- The Defining vs. Non-Defining Rule: This is the most important guideline. Use that for essential information (no commas) and which for extra, non-essential details (with commas).
- Formality and Flow: In spoken English and informal writing, 'that' is often used more frequently for defining clauses because it sounds more natural and fluid.
- The Omission Test: Just like other relative pronouns, you can omit 'that' or 'which' when it acts as the object of the clause. For example, "The book that you lent me was fascinating" can be shortened to "The book you lent me was fascinating."
5. Relative Clauses with 'Whose'
The possessive relative pronoun 'whose' is a powerful tool for showing ownership or a close relationship between a noun and what follows. It replaces possessive words like 'his', 'her', 'its', or 'their' to create a smoother, more sophisticated sentence. 'Whose' is versatile and can refer to people, animals, and even inanimate objects in both defining and non-defining clauses.
Because it connects a noun to something it possesses or is associated with, 'whose' adds a layer of descriptive detail that can be crucial for understanding. It directly links the subject or object to a specific characteristic or possession, clarifying the sentence's meaning in a single, elegant clause.
Strategic Analysis of Examples
Let's examine some relative clauses examples using 'whose' to see its strategic function in action.
Example 1: "The student whose essay won the contest received a scholarship."
- Analysis: The clause "whose essay won the contest" is essential. It identifies which specific student received the scholarship. Without it, "The student received a scholarship" is too general.
- Insight: 'Whose' links "student" directly to "essay," clarifying the relationship of ownership. This defining clause is critical for identifying the subject.
Example 2: "I am working for a company whose main office is in London."
- Analysis: The clause "whose main office is in London" specifies which company is being discussed. It answers the question, "Which company are you working for?"
- Insight: This demonstrates how 'whose' can be used for inanimate objects (a company). It connects the company to its main office, providing a defining piece of information.
Actionable Takeaways
To use 'whose' effectively in your own writing, concentrate on these tactical points:
- The Litmus Test: To check if 'whose' is the correct pronoun, try restructuring the clause using a possessive adjective (his, her, its, their). For example, "The student whose essay won" can be rephrased as "Her essay won," confirming that 'whose' is the right choice.
- Don't Confuse with 'Who's': A common error is mixing up 'whose' (possessive) with 'who's' (a contraction of "who is" or "who has"). Always double-check your sentence. "The man who's calling" means "The man who is calling," which is different from "The man whose phone is ringing."
- Follow with a Noun: The pronoun 'whose' must always be followed immediately by a noun (e.g., whose essay, whose office, whose dog). This noun is what belongs to or is associated with the person or thing mentioned before.
6. Relative Clauses with Prepositions
Handling prepositions within relative clauses is a mark of grammatical sophistication, allowing for nuanced and structurally sound sentences. When a verb in a relative clause requires a preposition (e.g., speak to, work with, look for), the placement of that preposition can shift, signaling a change in formality. This flexibility is crucial for adapting your writing and speech to different audiences and contexts.
The two primary structures involve placing the preposition either at the beginning of the clause for a formal tone or at the end for a more common, informal feel. Understanding when and why to use each style is key to mastering advanced sentence construction.
Strategic Analysis of Examples
Let's dissect some relative clauses examples that demonstrate this formal and informal split.
Example 1 (Formal): "The person to whom I spoke was very helpful."
- Analysis: The preposition "to" is placed before the relative pronoun "whom." This construction is characteristic of formal, academic, or professional writing. It clearly links the preposition to its object ("whom").
- Insight: In this formal structure, you must use "whom" for people and "which" for things. Using "who" or "that" directly after a preposition (e.g., "to who," "to that") is grammatically incorrect.
Example 2 (Informal): "The person who I spoke to was very helpful."
- Analysis: This is the more common, conversational version of the same sentence. The preposition "to" moves to the end of the clause. This is known as preposition stranding.
- Insight: This informal style allows for more flexibility with pronouns. You can use "who" or even "that" (e.g., "The person that I spoke to..."), and the relative pronoun can often be omitted entirely: "The person I spoke to..."
Actionable Takeaways
To use prepositional relative clauses effectively, consider these tactical points:
- Audience dictates style: For academic papers, business reports, or formal speeches, use the formal "preposition + whom/which" structure. For emails, social media, and everyday conversation, the informal structure with the preposition at the end is perfectly acceptable and sounds more natural.
- Pronoun Police: When you place a preposition at the beginning of the clause, it must be followed by whom (for people) or which (for things). Never use who or that in this position.
- The Omission Test (Informal Only): In the informal structure, you can often omit the relative pronoun if it's the object. "The tool that he fixed the car with" can become "The tool he fixed the car with." This is not possible in the formal structure.
7. Reduced Relative Clauses (Participle Clauses)
Reduced relative clauses, also known as participle clauses, are a sophisticated way to make writing more concise and elegant. They are shortened versions of full relative clauses where the relative pronoun (like 'who', 'which', or 'that') and often an auxiliary verb (like 'is' or 'was') are omitted. This transforms the clause into a more direct modifier using a present participle (-ing) or a past participle (-ed).
Using these structures elevates your writing, making it sound more fluent and less repetitive. They are especially common in formal and academic writing, where conciseness is highly valued.
The infographic below outlines the simple, three-step process for converting a full relative clause into its reduced form.
This process flow shows how identifying and removing the relative pronoun and auxiliary verb is the key to creating a more streamlined participle phrase.
Strategic Analysis of Examples
Let's dissect some relative clauses examples that have been reduced to see their structure and impact.
Example 1: "The man standing by the door is my uncle."
- Analysis: This is the reduced form of "The man who is standing by the door is my uncle." The relative pronoun 'who' and the auxiliary verb 'is' are removed, leaving the present participle 'standing' to modify "the man."
- Insight: The active voice ('the man is standing') requires the present participle (-ing). This creates a more dynamic and immediate description.
Example 2: "The book written by Hemingway is famous."
- Analysis: This shortens the full clause "The book which was written by Hemingway is famous." By dropping 'which was', we are left with the past participle 'written'.
- Insight: Here, the passive voice ('the book was written') dictates the use of a past participle (-ed/-en). This structure efficiently focuses on the object and the action performed on it.
For a deeper dive into how these clauses are formed and used, the following video provides a clear and practical explanation.
Actionable Takeaways
To use reduced relative clauses effectively, keep these strategies in mind:
- Active vs. Passive Voice: This is the core principle. If the original clause is in the active voice, use the present participle (-ing form). If it is in the passive voice, use the past participle (-ed/-en form).
- Subject Consistency: You can only reduce a relative clause when the subject of the main clause is the same entity being described in the relative clause. The clause must directly modify the noun it follows.
- Clarity is Key: Ensure the reduced clause is placed immediately after the noun it modifies to avoid confusion. A poorly placed participle can lead to a "dangling modifier," where it incorrectly describes the wrong noun. For example, "Written by Hemingway, I read the famous book" is incorrect.
7 Key Examples of Relative Clauses
| Aspect | Defining Relative Clauses ⭐🔄 | Non-defining Relative Clauses ⭐🔄 | Relative Clauses with 'Who' and 'Whom' ⭐🔄 | Relative Clauses with 'Which' and 'That' ⭐🔄 | Relative Clauses with 'Whose' ⭐🔄 | Relative Clauses with Prepositions ⭐🔄 | Reduced Relative Clauses (Participle) ⚡⭐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implementation Complexity 🔄 | Moderate; requires precise positioning and no commas | Moderate; requires correct comma placement | Low to Moderate; requires understanding subject/object roles | Low; distinction between 'which' and 'that' needed | Moderate; must follow with noun | High; formal/informal styles and preposition placement | High; omits pronouns, uses participles correctly |
| Resource Requirements 💡 | Intermediate to Advanced grammar knowledge | Intermediate to Advanced grammar knowledge | Intermediate grammar and formality awareness | Beginner to Intermediate grammar knowledge | Intermediate grammar knowledge | Advanced grammatical awareness and style sensitivity | Advanced grammar and writing skills |
| Expected Outcomes 📊 | Clear, precise identification without ambiguity | Adds supplementary info with clarity | Correct, formal reference to people | Flexible, concise description of objects | Shows possession clearly and elegantly | Formal or informal but correct sentence flow | Concise, flowing sentences with reduced repetition |
| Ideal Use Cases 💡 | Essential info for identifying nouns | Adding extra, non-essential details | People-focused relative clauses in formal writing | Things/animals/groups in varied registers | Indicating possession/relationship | Complex sentences requiring prepositional phrases | Formal and academic writing for conciseness |
| Key Advantages ⭐ | Reduces ambiguity; precise and integrated | Enriches text; adds detail without confusion | Maintains formal correctness; sophisticated style | Adaptable; supports both formal/informal use | Eliminates possessive redundancy; smooth flow | Flexibility in style; maintains grammatical accuracy | Enhances flow; reduces verbosity |
| Common Challenges/Cons 🔄 | Can confuse learners; complex sentences | Comma errors; sentence interruptions | Declining 'whom' usage; formality confusion | Confusing choice; regional usage differences | Can sound formal; usage with inanimates debated | Formality may sound stiff; pronoun confusion | Ambiguity; dangling modifiers; not always possible |
Putting It All Together: From Examples to Expertise
Throughout this comprehensive guide, we have journeyed through the intricate world of relative clauses, exploring a wide array of relative clauses examples to illuminate their structure and function. We started with the fundamental distinction between defining clauses, which provide essential information, and non-defining clauses, which add extra, descriptive detail. This core concept is the bedrock upon which all other variations are built.
From there, we analyzed the specific roles of relative pronouns like who, whom, whose, which, and that. We saw how a simple choice between who and whom can dramatically shift the formality of a sentence, or how the strategic use of whose adds a layer of possessive detail that would otherwise require a clunkier phrase. The key insight is that these are not just grammatical placeholders; they are precision instruments for conveying exact meaning and tone.
Core Strategic Takeaways
Mastering relative clauses is about moving beyond rote memorization and into the realm of strategic application. The most impactful writers don't just know the rules; they know when and why to apply them.
Here are the most critical strategies to internalize from our examples:
Clarity Through Restriction: Use defining relative clauses without commas to pinpoint exactly which person or thing you are discussing. This is your tool for eliminating ambiguity and ensuring your reader understands a specific subject. For example, "The report that you sent yesterday is incomplete" leaves no doubt about which report is being discussed.
Richness Through Description: Employ non-defining relative clauses, set off by commas, to layer in additional information. This technique adds depth and context, making your writing more engaging and informative. Think of it as a narrative aside, like in, "Our CEO, who founded the company in her garage, announced new expansion plans."
Efficiency Through Reduction: Leverage reduced relative clauses (using -ing or -ed participles) to create more concise and dynamic sentences. This advanced technique streamlines your writing, making it sound more sophisticated and less repetitive. Transforming "The man who is sitting on the bench" into "The man sitting on the bench" is a powerful move toward professional prose.
Actionable Next Steps for Mastery
Understanding these concepts is the first step, but true fluency comes from consistent, deliberate practice. To transition from academic knowledge to intuitive skill, you must actively integrate these structures into your own speaking and writing.
- Become a Clause Spotter: For one week, actively look for relative clauses examples in everything you read-from news articles and business emails to novels and social media posts. Analyze why the author chose a particular type of clause.
- Practice Sentence Combining: Take simple, related sentences and combine them using different relative clauses. For example, turn "The scientist won a Nobel Prize. She discovered a new particle." into "The scientist who discovered a new particle won a Nobel Prize."
- Use Contextual Drills: Work through exercises that force you to choose the correct relative pronoun or clause structure based on context. This is where theory meets practical application and where deep learning happens.
Ultimately, command over relative clauses separates functional English from masterful communication. It allows you to build complex ideas, add nuanced detail, and control the rhythm and flow of your sentences. This skill is invaluable, elevating your professional emails, academic papers, and everyday conversations from simple to sophisticated.
Ready to turn these examples into expertise? The English Fluent Telegram bot offers hundreds of interactive exercises based on Murphy's Grammar in Use, focusing on the very relative clauses we've covered. Get instant feedback on your choices and practice until these structures become second nature. Start your journey to fluent, confident writing today at English Fluent.
Article created using Outrank